Loading...
Loading...
Accessibility & Compliance
WCAG 2.1 AA/AAA compliance for accessible websites
Make your website accessible to everyone with WCAG 2.1 compliance. We implement accessible design, semantic HTML, keyboard navigation, and screen reader supp...
Web accessibility isn't just good ethics—it's often legally required and expands your audience. We implement WCAG 2.1 Level AA (or AAA) compliance, ensuring your website works for people with visual, auditory, motor, and cognitive disabilities. Our accessibility work covers semantic HTML, ARIA labels, keyboard navigation, color contrast, screen reader compatibility, and more. We use automated tools (axe, Lighthouse) plus manual testing with real assistive technologies.
Everything you need for success
How we work with you
Assess current accessibility state and WCAG compliance gaps
Prioritize fixes and create accessibility roadmap
Fix accessibility issues and implement WCAG requirements
Test with screen readers, keyboard, and automated tools
Verify WCAG compliance with comprehensive testing
Document accessibility features and provide VPAT/ACR
What you'll achieve
Reach 15-20% more users (people with disabilities)
Avoid ADA lawsuits and legal liability
Improve SEO (semantic HTML helps search engines)
Better usability for all users, not just disabled
Meet government and enterprise requirements
Demonstrate social responsibility and inclusion
Everything you need to know
WCAG (Web Content Accessibility Guidelines) has 3 levels: A (basic), AA (standard for most sites), AAA (highest, often unrealistic). Level AA is the most common requirement—meets ADA, Section 508, and most legal requirements. AAA only needed for specific cases (government, healthcare). Focus on AA unless contract/law requires AAA.
Depends on site size and current state. Small site (10-20 pages) with modern framework: 1-2 weeks. Large site with legacy code: 4-8 weeks. E-commerce or complex app: 2-3 months. Quick wins (color contrast, alt text, labels) can be done fast. Structural issues (keyboard navigation, ARIA) take longer. Can prioritize critical pages first.
No. Automated tools (axe, Lighthouse, WAVE) catch ~30-40% of issues—color contrast, missing labels, HTML structure. Manual testing needed for: screen reader experience, keyboard navigation flow, content clarity, error messages, complex interactions. Best approach: automated tools for quick checks, manual testing with real assistive tech for compliance.
Focus on most common: JAWS (Windows screen reader, ~40% market), NVDA (free Windows screen reader, ~30%), VoiceOver (Mac/iOS built-in, ~20%), keyboard-only navigation. Test on: latest Chrome + NVDA, Safari + VoiceOver, Firefox + JAWS. Also test keyboard navigation in all browsers. These cover 95%+ of assistive tech users.
Let's discuss your project and how we can help you achieve your goals.